What is the Difference Between Direct and Indirect ELISA?

What is the Difference Between Direct and Indirect ELISA?

A Direct ELISA uses a labeled primary antibody that is conjugated directly to an enzyme, while an indirect ELISA relies on a primary and conjugated secondary antibody combination. The conjugated secondary antibody can bind to many different primary antibodies.

Direct ELISA: Benefits and Challenges 

A direct ELISA provides a straightforward approach to antigen detection, making it an advantageous tool for assay developers. This method uses the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay protocol where the primary antibody binds directly to the target antigen. One of its significant benefits includes reduced cross-reactivity, allowing for a more specific response.

However, challenges exist in employing such methodology. Detecting low levels of antigens might prove difficult due to the absence of signal amplification present in techniques like an indirect ELISA that utilize labeled secondary antibodies.

Furthermore, each primary antibody requires separate labeling which can be tedious compared with indirect ELISAs where multiple primary antibodies could bind with the same labeled secondary antibody.

Using optimal immunoassay components for both direct and indirect ELISAs help assay developers optimize their assay accuracy. Learn more about Surmodics IVD’s ELISA reagents and start your free evaluation today!

A close-up of a machineDescription automatically generated






Indirect ELISA: Benefits and Challenges

An indirect ELISA (enzyme linked immunosorbent assay) offers a unique advantage over a direct ELISA because it uses secondary antibodies. This approach gives room for signal amplification, which increases the sensitivity of the test.

High sensitivity is crucial when detecting low levels of antigens in a sample. An indirect ELISA also allows for flexibility since different labeled secondary antibodies can be used with the same primary antibody. An indirect ELISA allows multiple binding sites on the primary antibody for the secondary antibody to amplify signal.

Despite these advantages, using an indirect ELISA poses some challenges too. One significant downside is cross-reactivity as multiple binding sites on the secondary antibody may attach to undesired proteins, causing false positive results.

Surmodics IVD offers several ELISA reagents designed to help reduce cross-reactivity and false positives. Visit our ELISA Troubleshooting Guide to learn more.

A diagram of a dna sequenceDescription automatically generated with medium confidence

Detection Antibody Principle

The detection antibody principle plays a central role in many biomedical tests, such as ELISA. It involves using an antibody that can specifically bind to the target antigen of interest. This targeted interaction allows for precise and accurate identification of the substance being tested for.

In most cases, the detection antibody comes pre-tagged with a reporter enzyme such as horseradish peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase. Once this labelled antibody forms a complex with its corresponding antigen, it initiates an enzymatic reaction that creates color change or chemiluminescence. This visible signal is directly proportional to the amount of bound antigen present in the sample.

Creating specific antibodies for detection requires meticulous design and testing, ensuring little cross-reactivity occurs. By doing so, false positives decrease significantly, and results become more reliable.

New advances in engineering offer ways to enhance sensitivity levels or modify binding properties for optimal performance. Learn more about how Surmodics IVD can help improve assay sensitivity.

Nevertheless, assay developers must monitor possible cross-reactivity from using two species-specific antibodies within this application as  it may lead to false positive results if not properly managed. Surmodics IVD’s sample/assay diluents offer the best option for reducing false positive results.

A blue and pink lines with dotsDescription automatically generated







Assay developers often have questions about the accuracy of direct and indirect ELISAs. One common question is which ELISA is more accurate. In terms of accuracy, both direct and indirect ELISAs can provide reliable results when properly executed.

The choice between the two methods depends on the specific assay requirements and target antigen characteristics.


1. How does a sandwich ELISA differ from direct and indirect ELISAs?

In a sandwich ELISA, instead of binding the enzyme labeled antibody to the antigen directly as in direct or indirect Elisa, we first attach an unlabeled capture antibody onto a plate, then add the antigen followed by detecting it with another specific labelled detection-antibody.

2. Does an indirect ELISA use more than one type of antibody?

Yes! In an indirect ELISA you will need two types of antibodies: A non-labelled primary antibody which will bind specifically to your target-antigen, and a labelled secondary antibody which recognizes all types (or classes) of primary antibodies used within your experimental setup.

3. Which ELISA is more accurate?

The accuracy of an ELISA test can depend on various factors, including the specific assay protocol and the nature of the target antigen. In general, both direct and indirect ELISA methods can provide accurate results when performed correctly.

A direct ELISA involves coating a plate with the antigen of interest. This allows for direct detection of the antigen by adding a labeled detection antibody that binds directly to the antigen captured on the plate.

The advantage of a direct ELISA is its simplicity and shorter incubation times compared to an indirect ELISA. However, one potential limitation is that it may be less sensitive than indirect ELISA due to the presence of only one conjugated antibody binding to the target protein.

An indirect ELISA uses two antibodies - a primary antibody that specifically recognizes and binds to the target antigen, followed by a labeled secondary antibody that detects this primary-secondary antibody combination.

This amplifies signal detection and provides increased sensitivity compared to a direct ELISA because two conjugated antibodies can bind to the primary antibody. However, an indirect ELISA requires additional steps and longer incubation times.

In conclusion, while both direct and indirect ELISAs have their advantages and challenges, their accuracy ultimately depends on careful optimization of assay conditions and appropriate selection of antibodies.

Contact our R&D Team today to learn more about how Surmodics IVD’s ELISA reagents can help optimize your direct and indirect ELISA today!